From ignorance, to tolerance, to celebration, to condemnation – LGBT rights, as well as other forms of identity politics, has resulted in totalitarianism.
I know this isn’t a new idea, but its worth repeating as this juggernaut of authoritarian thought has picked up speed and discriminately, and I use that word advisedly, plowed through candidates in this electoral cycle. In this post I am focusing on the LGBT aspect because it is the most significant in the interview which has inspired this post, but I could have just as easily spoke about abortion in its place.
A quote without a context is a pretext
The interview in question, that between Andrew Marr and Michael Fallon, comes as the result of the prospect of a working relationship between Conservatives and the DUP.
In this clip you can see the question from Marr to Fallon “Are you repulsed by gay people?”
In this question he already demonstrates the blatant bias he is guilty of, as it is a misquote of who he is claiming is a symbol of the ‘inappropriateness’ (the political correct version of sin every one) of the DUP: Ian Paisley Junior.
Now, as a practising Catholic with an Irish passport I can tell you I’m no fan of the Paisley family. I still remember Ian’s pops, the senior Paisley, and his mockery of the Catholic belief in the real presence of the Eucharist during ‘The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. I’m a lady, I won’t put a lable to what I think of him.
However, the actual quote of Paisley junior is;
‘I am pretty repulsed by gays and lesbianism. I think its wrong. I think those people harm themselves and, without a care about it, harm society. I hate what they do.’
A quote without a context is a pretext, and the context here demonstrates that what Paisley hates is firstly the damage homosexuality causes as well as distaste for the homosexual act.
The way Marr paraphrases the quote is significant; hating the act and its impact on society has become the same as hating the people. However, Marr also insinuates that anyone who isn’t at best noncommittal about, if not down-right impressed by, homosexual acts they break a modern day commandment. They are heretics and must be cast out!
Let’s just deal with the act itself – and for the sake of brevity I’m limiting myself to male on male sexual activity. In my opening section I spoke about ignorance. This is a word, co-joined to bigot, that the LGBT lobby and its supporters bandies about to mark anyone who disagrees with the movement’s beliefs to slander and therefore disarm their arguments without having to actually debate them.
There’s a reason for that; the ignorance is actually on this side of those who assert that homosexuals are ‘born that way’, and that ‘love is love’.
The reason why the LGBT lobby asserted the ‘born this way’ mantra was because it was an easy way to tap into the arguments of black civil rights in America. But actually there has always been a significant amount of evidence to show that people aren’t actually ‘born that way’.
Born that way?
There are men and women who have had sexual relationship with those of the opposite sex before coming out; and there are those who have same sex relationships who then have life long heterosexual ones. The LGBT lobby declare that these people from the latter group, when they’re not bullying them to try and silence them, were never ‘truly’ gay.
Ok, they’re not truly gay? So how can you determine who is? Because this just sounds like categorising people according to who fits the agenda, not what is.
We certainly can’t determine who is truly gay based on biology. The human genome which was a massive study charting all DNA and its physical codes did not find evidence of the ‘gay’ gene. If people were really ‘born that way’ you would expect this. Incidentally, other markers have proved unfruitful too.
Well what about in utero? Surely there could be some explanation there?
Well twin studies seem to determine that homosexuality is an acquired trait. This is just one of many studies that show that twins, who have identical DNA and, in many studies, the same upbringing do not have the suspected outcome of both siblings being homosexual.
So the ‘born this way’ theory is, at the very least. questionable.
Why the importance of this topic – they’re the questions that dare not be spoken?
When I was younger I was very much convinced by the BTW argument but, along with other arguments to do with the need of the freedom without societal restrain for people to chose their own sexual choices – living together etc – I believed it was “there business’.
However, what was ‘there business’ has now become everyone’s. I can still, just get away with debating divorce, single parenthood, co-habitation and other sexual choices without fear of losing my job, business or fear of imprisonment but as homosexuality has been designated, by force of common mythology rather than actual science, as an innate characteristic under the Public Order Act speaking in the same manner about homosexuality the latter scenario isn’t without the realms of possibility.
So, if we view homosexuality as a sexual and a lifestyle choice like any other is the condemnation and distortion of what Paisley Junior says any less wrong?
“I think those people harm themselves…”
In our current society where we are policing the sugar content of other people’s food the deliberate obtuseness of the fallout of same sex practise, and its promotion even at government level, is bizarre.
Firstly there are very real physical ramifications as a result of M/M sex that are more severe than heterosexual sex because of promiscuity (which I’ll go into later) but also because of the nature of sex among men. R. R. Wilcox wrote in “Sexual Behaviour and Sexually Transmitted Disease Patterns in Male Homosexuals,” (British Journal of Venereal Diseases 1981) summarizes the danger as follows:
“Male homosexual behaviour is not simply either ‘active’ or ‘passive,’ since penile-anal, mouth-penile, and hand-anal sexual contact is usual for both partners, and mouth-anal contact is not infrequent. . . . Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence of diseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma may encourage the entry of micro-organisms and thus lead to primary syphilitic lesions occurring in the anogenital area. . . . In addition to sodomy, trauma may be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile adornments, and prostheses.”20
When the issue of sodomy is brought up online defenders of the LGBT dogma will often post “heterosexuals do it too” as if that’s it, argument over. Firstly these arguments still apply to them, they are objective facts, not subjective. As the LGBT lobby has made the discussion of these serious difficulties a slur on the people themselves (like Marr does above) they label criticism a ‘phobia’ and silence arguments. But the outcomes don’t just go away and as homosexual men engage in these activities to a far greater extent than heterosexuals it has a significant impact on them as a group not just society picking up the bill.
Human physiology was not designed to accommodate this activity. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis;
- in natural lubricants
- the network of muscles
- it is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage
- and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm.
In comparison, the anus;
- is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an “exit-only” passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic.
- The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.
- Ejaculate has components that are immunosuppressive. In the course of ordinary reproductive physiology, this allows the sperm to evade the immune defenses of the female.
- The end result is that the fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections.
Diseases that are associated with anal sex are;
Herpes simplex virus
Human immunodeficiency virus
Human papilloma virus
Viral hepatitis types B & C
The only epidemiological study to date on the life span of gay men concluded that gay and bisexual men lose up to 20 years of life expectancy.
I haven’t even gone into oral/anal sex as well as other practices associated with homosexual sex; I think this is enough to prove that perhaps Ian Paisley Jr isn’t wrong in his assessment.
Added to how much more impact upon the body homosexual sex has you need to consider that the rate that disease spreads is significantly higher as the concept of monogamy is very different.
Joseph Harry in his Gay Couples, study (Praeger Books, 1984) reported that 66 percent of gay couples reported sex outside the relationship within the first year, and nearly 90 percent if the relationship lasted five years.
Their lifestyle hurts their mental health too..
There have been numerous studies that have identified high rates of psychiatric illness (depression, drug abuse and suicide attempts) among “out” gays and lesbians. Just a few examples are;
- Judith Bradford, Caitlin Ryan, and Esther D. Rothblum, “National Lesbian Health Care Survey: Implications for Mental Health Care,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Richard C. Pillard, “Sexual orientation and mental disorder,” Psychiatric Annals,
Although the argument has been put forward that this is a result of other people’s unwillingness to accept same-sex attraction and behaviour as normal, an extensive study in the Netherlands undermines this.
The Dutch have been considerably more accepting of same-sex relationships than other Western countries in fact, being one of the first to allow same-sex couples the legal right to marry in the Netherlands. So a high rate of psychiatric disease associated with homosexual behavior in the Netherlands means that the psychiatric disease cannot so easily be attributed to social rejection and homophobia.
The extensive Dutch study (published in the Archives of General Psychiatry by Theo Sandfort, Ron de Graaf, et al., “Same-sex Sexual Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders,” January 2001) indeed found a high rate of psychiatric disease associated with same-sex sex.77
In it controls who had no homosexual experience in the 12 months prior to the interview were compared to males who had any homosexual contact within that time period; the latter were much more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder. The researchers found “that homosexuality is not only associated with mental health problems during adolescence and early adulthood, as has been suggested, but also in later life.” They actually feared that methodological features of “the study might underestimate the differences between homosexual and heterosexual people.”They concluded, “this study offers evidence that homosexuality is associated with a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders. The outcomes are in line with findings from earlier studies in which less rigorous designs have been employed.”81 The researchers offered no opinion as to whether homosexual behavior causes psychiatric disorders, or whether the attraction itself it is the result of psychiatric disorders.
…without a care about it, harm society.
Have you ever wondered why there are always a heavy presence of LGBT groups at, say, pro-planned parenthood events? Or why many will turn out to harangue the March for Life in the US? After all, one thing same sex is safe from is pregnancy right? It’s because the disintegration of moral codes was necessary to promote the acceptance of the LGBT lifestyle.
Think about the gay marriage arguments; the argument was always termed with the emphasis on love, the adults feelings for each other, not the responsibilities that adult had to won they produced and society at large when they engaged in sex. This is why ether is marriage. SSM has been termed in celebrating love. But actually the institution of marriage is about the respect for the commitment made to each other and its societies business because if its not there it has an impact on society itself.
As I said in this post the societal implications of the unrestrained sexual activity are devastating. This is why the ideal of sexual activity being limited to marriage, always defined as male-female, has been a fence erected in all civilizations around the globe.
Even though in practise some have “climbed over the fence”; engaging in premarital, extramarital and homosexual sex, the fence stood. Climbing over the fence, metaphorically, has always been recognized as a breach of those limits, even by the breachers themselves. No civilization can retain its vitality for multiple generations after removing the fence.
But now social activists are saying that there should be no fence, and that to destroy the fence is an act of liberation and this comes in no small part through homosexual promotion as my example shows. They desire no visible boundary to sexual expression, including children produced, hence the support of abortion, so that gay sex is accepted.
This won’t end here either.as many have pointed out before and the new fascination with transgenderism suggests if all sexually activity is to be socially acceptable, what logical reason can there be to deny social acceptance of adultery, polygamy, or pedophilia?
As Milo recently spoke about, pedophilia and the grooming of boys is common to homosexuals. The definition of same sex marriage doesn’t include what adultery would be, and the lifestyle doesn’t care as I’ve said, so how will heterosexual marriage be held to account? Already LGBT Attitude magazine has pushed polygamy.
Lesbian social critic Camille Paglia observes, “history shows that male homosexuality, which like prostitution flourishes with urbanization and soon becomes predictably ritualized, always tends toward decadence.”
The Left, currently drawing not he HandMaidens tale as a critique of Trump seem ignorant of how this would be a better allegory of how poor women are used for wombs to rent by homosexual men.
Was Ian Paisley Right?
Giving gays and lesbians the social approval they desire may ultimately lead to an early death for others who might have restrained their sexual behaviour. Research designed to prove that gays and lesbians are “born that way” has come up empty there is no scientific evidence that being gay or lesbian is genetically determined. Even researcher Dean Hamer, who once hoped he had identified a “gay gene,” admits “there is a lot more than just genes going on.”
As the agenda is pushed relationships that were platonic, friendships between the sexes are sexualised; everything is sexualised.
So with the personal and public costs why are we promoting this? Why is anyone who questions homosexuality vilified? Why do we have to celebrate?